The Digital Millennium Copyright Act


  • DMCA has five Titles:
    • Title I ensures the Act’s compliance with WIPO (an international copyright treaty),
    • Title II limits liability of online service providers (OSPs),
    • Title III allows temporary, limited copies during ongoing computer repair work,
    • Title IV contains Miscellaneous Provisions, and
    • Title V provides new protections for boat hull designs.
  • Title II is the principal change that DMCA creates in U.S. copyright law.

Who is a Service Provider?

“The term ‘service provider’ means an entity offering the transmission, routing, or providing of connections for digital online communications, between or among points specified by a user, of material of the user’s choosing, without modification to the content of the material as sent or received.” Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 112 Stat. 2860, 2886 (1998).

“Safe Harbor” Provision

Title II of the DMCA provides online service providers with a safe harbor provision, limiting their direct and indirect liability in infringement cases. 17 U.S.C. § 512 (2010). This safe harbor provision applies if the OSP:

(i) does not have actual knowledge that the material or an activity using the material on the system or network is infringing;

(ii) in the absence of such actual knowledge, is not aware of facts or circumstances from which infringing activity is apparent; or

(iii) upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously to remove, or disable access to, the material;

Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 112 Stat. 2860, 2880 (1998).

Before removing the copyright material, an OSP must receive a written notification of claimed infringement.

Notification of Infringement

The notification to OSPs must include:

  1. A physical or electronic signature of a person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
  2. Identification of the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed (or a list thereof)
  3. Identification of the material that is claimed to be infringing . . . and information reasonably sufficient to permit the service provider to locate the material.
  4. Contact information of the complaining company.
  5. A statement that the complaining party has a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
  6. A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 112 Stat. 2860, 2881 (1998).

Counter Notification by the Subscriber

A counter notification is a written communication provided to the service provider’s designated agent that includes substantially the following:

  1. A signature of the subscriber.
  2. Identification of the material that has been removed or to which access has been disabled and the location at which the material appeared.
  3. A statement under penalty of perjury that the subscriber has a good faith belief that the material was removed or disabled as a result of mistake or misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled.
  4. The subscriber’s contact information, and a statement that the subscriber consents to the jurisdiction of Federal District Court for the judicial district in which the subscriber is located.


EPGD Business Law is located in beautiful Coral Gables, West Palm Beach and historic Washington D.C. Call us at (786) 837-6787, or contact us through the website to schedule a consultation.

*Disclaimer: this blog post is not intended to be legal advice. We highly recommend speaking to an attorney if you have any legal concerns. Contacting us through our website does not establish an attorney-client relationship.*

Share this post

Silvino Diaz

Silvino E. Diaz’s practice ranges from Civil and Commercial Litigation to Entertainment and Intellectual Property Law. Silvino has earned a reputation as one of Puerto Rico’s foremost advocates for independent musicians and artists. As a result of his sustained commitment to creative industries, he was named Professor of Intellectual Property Law at Atlantic University College (Guaynabo, PR) – the Caribbean’s leading digital arts institution – where he spearheaded the “Introduction to IP” course for both the graduate and undergraduate programs, and was appointed by the Office of the President to develop an Intellectual Property graduate curriculum, where he served until moving to Miami in 2017. He is the founder of the service known as Starving Artists, where he offers innovative business and legal counsel for artists and creatives.


*The following comments are not intended to be treated as legal advice. The answer to your question is limited to the basic facts presented. Additional details may heavily alter our assessment and change the answer provided. For a more thorough review of your question please contact our office for a consultation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Contact Us

"*" indicates required fields